Bickerton Law Blog
  • Home
  • About us
  • Bickerton Law Blog
  • Legal Strategy Consultations with Bickerton Legal
  • No categories
Select Page

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. Israel Santiago

by Lea Bickerton | Sep 19, 2009 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries

Commonwealth v. Israel Santiago J-34-2009 (8/25/2009)Topic: Motion to Withdraw – Anders BriefSummary: When filing an Anders Brief, counsel must include an explanation for why s/he believes that the issues the defendant wishes to raise on appeal are wholly...

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. Steven Gravely

by Lea Bickerton | May 29, 2009 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries

Commonwealth v. Steven Gravely J-190-2008 (5/27/2009)Topic: Criminal Appeals – Extension of time to file a Statement Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)Summary: An appellant must request an extension of time to file a Concise Statement of Matters Complained of on...

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. Michael Burton

by Lea Bickerton | May 17, 2009 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries

Commonwealth v. Michael Burton 2009 PA Super 87 (5/13/2009)Topic: Statement Pursuant to 1925(b) – Waiver – Late FilingSummary: The late filing of a 1925(b) statement is per se ineffectiveness. Therefore, the late filing of a 1925(b) statement will be...

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. Michael John Paul Macias

by Lea Bickerton | Mar 17, 2009 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries, sentencing

Commonwealth v. Michael John Paul Macias 2009 PA Super 45 (3/17/2009)Topic: Sentencing – Abuse of Discretion – Impermissible Factors to ConsiderSummary: Where a sentencing court justifies its enhanced sentence (in part) by stating that the facts of the...

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. Foster

by Lea Bickerton | Oct 26, 2008 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries, Mandatory Sentence

Commonwealth v. Foster 2008 PA Super 252Topic: Mandatory Minimum SentencesSummary: A challenge alleging that a trial court erroneously applied a mandatory minimum sentence challenges the legality of the sentence, not the discretionary aspects of sentencing. Therefore,...

BriefLaw: Commonwealth v. O’Malley

by Lea Bickerton | Oct 11, 2008 | Appeal, Case Law Summaries, sentencing

Commonwealth v. O’Malley 2008 PA Super 224 Topic: Sentencing Summary: If you negotiate a sentence, you can’t come back and challenge the discretionary aspects of sentencing. Click to access s36045_08.pdf Share this: Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook...
« Older Entries

Disclaimer

The contents of this blog are the observations, opinions, and intellectual property of the authors and do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.

This website and blog are for educational purposes. If you are looking for a lawyer, contact the law practice of Bickerton Legal at (412) 267-9218 All rights are reserved.

Copyright © 2006-2026 Bickerton Law

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
Copyright © 2006-2026 Bickerton Law